[LU] Arbitration Decision
malcolm dunn
malcolm.dunn at sky.com
Thu Apr 17 19:16:14 BST 2008
I thought the arbitration panel was independent (or cetainly the chairman
anyway). They (he)should not be taking into account the consequences of
their decision, surely they (the panel)should only be concerned with the
legalities of the matter.
Malc
----- Original Message -----
From: <Andy.Kneale at jpmchase.com>
To: <leedslist at list.zetnet.co.uk>
Sent: Thursday, April 17, 2008 4:08 PM
Subject: Re: [LU] Arbitration Decision
>
> We'll get nowt. It's all or nothing - either the decision was lawful or
> it
> wasn't - it can't be partly lawful. If we got 15 points back, the rest of
> the league would be in uproar and the FL would then face legal challenges
> on their decision by all the clubs. They'd rather crucify one club than
> face mass unrest.
>
> Gaffer
>
>
More information about the Leedslist
mailing list