[LU] Can anyone explain...

[Paul Dally]

Simply because the panel may have other commitments and have to each spend 
some time pouring over the detailed arguments and case law raised by each 
side.

It is common practice in the law for all judgments to be delayed in this 
way.
----- Original Message ----- 
From: <andyclayton65 at gmail.com>
To: "Alec McQueen" <alecmcq at gmail.com>; <leedslist at list.zetnet.co.uk>
Sent: Friday, April 18, 2008 9:32 PM
Subject: Re: [LU] Can anyone explain...


It isn't; it's now due by May 1st - which being my birthday, it better be 
good news!

Andy C


Sent from my BlackBerry® wireless device

-----Original Message-----
From: "Alec McQueen" <alecmcq at gmail.com>

Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2008 06:29:06
To:leedslist at list.zetnet.co.uk
Subject: [LU] Can anyone explain...


.... any logical reason why the appeal decision should be delayed 3 weeks? 
It
just makes no sense at all.
Cheers
A
_______________________________________________
the Leeds List is an unmoderated mailing list and the list administrators 
accept no liability for the personal views and opinions of contributors.
Leedslist mailing list
Leedslist at list.zetnet.co.uk
http://list.zetnet.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist
DELETE THE FOOTERS WHEN REPLYING YOU LAZY SODS!!!!
DELETE THE FOOTERS WHEN REPLYING YOU LAZY SODS!!!!
_______________________________________________
the Leeds List is an unmoderated mailing list and the list administrators 
accept no liability for the personal views and opinions of contributors.
Leedslist mailing list
Leedslist at list.zetnet.co.uk
http://list.zetnet.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist
DELETE THE FOOTERS WHEN REPLYING YOU LAZY SODS!!!!
DELETE THE FOOTERS WHEN REPLYING YOU LAZY SODS!!!!