[LU] Leeds Ladies

[hotshotlorimer]

Yep, nothing's changed, it's STILL criminal to discuss it here.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "sinister dexter" <sinister at dogz-bollox.co.uk>
To: "Richard Young" <richard.young at gmail.com>
Cc: <leedslist at list.zetnet.co.uk>
Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2008 9:29 AM
Subject: Re: [LU] Leeds Ladies


>A sense of deja vu descends over the list ;-}
>
>
>
> On 7 May 2008, at 12:55, Richard Young wrote:
>
>> " Why the f*7k is wimmin's football EVER discussed on this list?
>>
>> I just do NOT get it.
>>
>> Adrian Dingle
>> Atlanta Whites"
>>
>> Er, why not? It's the Leeds United side. Granted, the quality is
>> pretty
>> poor. But although I dare say some list members fell away when the
>> men's
>> team started to play like shite, a lot of Leeds fans don't go to
>> matches for
>> the quality of the football on display - it's affinity with a club.
>> Christ,
>> if quality was the sole criterion, I'd have stopped going even
>> before we got
>> relegated from the top flight - and I was at Kenilworth Road 18
>> months ago
>> when Luton put five past us.  Besides, a handful of posts related to
>> Leeds
>> United's appearance in the FA Cup final hardly constitutes a mass
>> pollution
>> of the list....
>>
>> Richard
>> _______________________________________________
>
> _______________________________________________
> the Leeds List is an unmoderated mailing list and the list administrators 
> accept no liability for the personal views and opinions of contributors.
> Leedslist mailing list
> Leedslist at list.zetnet.co.uk
> http://list.zetnet.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist
> DELETE THE FOOTERS WHEN REPLYING YOU LAZY SODS!!!!
>